Skip to content
442ball
Menu
442 Power Rating · Week of Monday, 26 October 2026

Chapecoense-sc

Power Rating
1384.4
-1.8 in 8 weeksConfidence band 1338.8 to 1430.0

Its current strength, rated this week

Serie A (Brazil)
20th of 20
Behind Coritiba and Remo

How Chapecoense-sc play, in four numbers

Attack index83.6
Scores 16.4 percent less than the average Serie A (Brazil) side.
Defence index62.4
Concedes more than the average Serie A (Brazil) side. 100 is average.
Home edge
At home
1417.1
Away
1351.7
32.7 points either side of 1384.4
Long-run Rating
1379.8
The average weekly rating over the last 5 league seasons. This week sits 4.6 above it.

13 years, week by week

Move across the line to read any Monday.

1384.4Week of Monday, 26 October 2026
Peak
1541.5
Monday, 5 June 2017
Lowest
1331.1
Monday, 19 August 2024
Today against the peak
157.1 below
2010/11 is left out of peak and lowest

What moved the rating

Last 8 weeks, 7 matches, grouped. No single match is shown.

1386.2
-29.4
+20.9
+6.7
1384.4
8 weeks ago
4 defeats against higher-rated sides
2 wins against higher-rated sides
1 draw against a higher-rated side
This week

Each match moves a rating by how far the result beat or fell short of what the two ratings expected. Figures are rounded to one decimal.

Where Chapecoense-sc sit in Serie A (Brazil)

All Serie A (Brazil) ratings
11BahiaSerie A (Brazil)1529.5
12RB BragantinoSerie A (Brazil)1526.2
13InternacionalSerie A (Brazil)1514.7
14BotafogoSerie A (Brazil)1509.3
15CorinthiansSerie A (Brazil)1503.9
16GremioSerie A (Brazil)1492.6
17VitoriaSerie A (Brazil)1465.3
18CoritibaSerie A (Brazil)1462.1
19RemoSerie A (Brazil)1431.2
20Chapecoense-scSerie A (Brazil)1384.4

The league they play in

Ask your AI about Chapecoense-sc

free · no sign-in

Add 442ball to Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini or another assistant, then try one of these.

How to connectmcp.442ball.com/mcp

Ratings for the week of Monday, 26 October 2026. Computed 27 Oct 2026.

442 Power Ratings measure how strong a club's results have been. They are not predictions and not the data provider's ratings.

How the ratings work