
442 Power Rating · Week of Monday, 26 October 2026
Charleroi
Power Rating
1547.9
-0.2 in 8 weeksConfidence band 1517.5 to 1578.3
Its current strength, rated this week
Jupiler Pro League
6th of 18
Behind Genk and Gent
Rank in Europe
114th
Top 23 percent of Europe's rated clubs
How Charleroi play, in four numbers
Attack index95.1
Scores 4.9 percent less than the average Jupiler Pro League side.
Defence index110.4
Concedes less than the average Jupiler Pro League side. 100 is average.
Home edge
At home
1573.7
Away
1522.1
25.8 points either side of 1547.9
Long-run Rating
1486.5
The average weekly rating over the last 5 league seasons. This week sits 61.4 above it.
16 years, week by week
Move across the line to read any Monday.
1547.9Week of Monday, 26 October 2026
Settling season 2010/11
Peak
1604.4
Monday, 28 September 2020
Lowest
1380.6
Monday, 8 October 2012
Today against the peak
56.5 below
2010/11 is left out of peak and lowest
2010/11 is the settling season. Every club started level, so its ratings carry the widest band and are left out of the peak and lowest.
What moved the rating
Last 8 weeks, 5 matches, grouped. No single match is shown.
1548.1
+19.0
-13.9
-5.3
1547.9
8 weeks ago
3 wins against lower-rated sides
1 defeat against a lower-rated side
1 defeat against a higher-rated side
This week
Each match moves a rating by how far the result beat or fell short of what the two ratings expected. Figures are rounded to one decimal.
Where Charleroi sit in the Jupiler Pro League
All Jupiler Pro League ratings6CharleroiJupiler Pro League1547.9
The league they play in
Jupiler Pro League strength
1644.5
8th strongest league in Europe
The average rating of its top six clubs this week.
All Jupiler Pro League clubs by ratingLeague StrengthOverview
Ask your AI about Charleroi
free · no sign-inAdd 442ball to Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini or another assistant, then try one of these.
How to connect
mcp.442ball.com/mcpRatings for the week of Monday, 26 October 2026. Computed 27 Oct 2026.
442 Power Ratings measure how strong a club's results have been. They are not predictions and not the data provider's ratings.